Can You Get a Mutual Consent Divorce Without Attending Court in India?

Explores if mutual consent divorce in India can proceed without court appearance, considering legal provisions, exceptions, and technological alternatives.

FAMILY LAW

Khushi Singh Tomar

6/20/20254 min read

Separation is never easy, even when both individuals agree that it's time to go their separate ways. Mutual consent divorce provides a legal solution that allows a less adversarial, faster, and more civilized way to terminate a marriage. Although the process has become more efficient over time, one persistent question persists: Is it possible to obtain a mutual consent divorce without both partners being present in person in court?

This question arises from different scenarios, such as moving to a new city or country, busy schedules, demanding jobs, illness, and even stress. This article aims to focus on what the law in India provides, how judicial activism has shaped these policies, and whether there are options available for those who do not or choose not to attend in person.

Legal Basis of Mutual Consent Divorce in India:

Under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, spouses may obtain a mutual consent divorce if they have been separated for one year or more and together decide that their marriage must come to an end now.

This process is in two steps:

  • Filing the first motion, which may be done by filing a joint petition.

  • After a minimum cooling-off period of six months (maximum up to 18 months), both parties can submit a second motion. This is to re-evaluate whether both parties are still willing to proceed with the divorce.

    It is required that both parties appear in person at all stages to confirm the process.

Is Physical Court Appearance Mandatory?

Legally, indeed, personal presence is typically necessary to confirm that both individuals are participating willingly and with a full understanding. The judge documents their remarks, assesses their mental condition, checks the settlement conditions, and ensures there's no pressure or deceit.

However, life is not always foreseeable. There are circumstances when being present in person is challenging or unfeasible. Here is where the courts have demonstrated adaptability.

Judicial Interpretations and Evolving Practice:

Indian courts have recognized the legal necessity for physical presence in certain cases, but enforcement of such a requirement can act as an impediment to justice. Therefore, judicial relaxations have been granted in some situations.

Key Judicial Decisions:

Amit Kumar v. Suman Beniwal (2019) SCC Online Del 9527 – The Delhi High Court decided that the presence of a party through video conferencing is permissible in mutual consent divorce cases in which the spouse stays abroad and cannot travel due to genuine reasons.

Pranav Kumar Mishra v. Anu Mishra (2007) SCC Online Del 838 – The Delhi High Court noted that mutual divorce is a consensual process and that procedural mercy should be particularly granted, in instances where personal appearances can cause unnecessary problems.

Ruchi Majoo v. Sanjeev Majoo (2011) 6 SCC 479 – The Supreme Court of India upheld that the virtual attendance in family matters, with appropriate identification and supervision, can fulfill the role of physical presence.

These examples show the court's flexibility to adjust to evolving social and technological circumstances.

Situations Where Exemption May Be Granted:

Judges might take into account allowing a spouse to be excused from appearing in person under these circumstances:

  •  The partner lives abroad, making travel inconvenient or expensive.

  • Health issues or mental health conditions complicate attending court.

  • There are security threats or concerns regarding domestic abuse.

  • The partner cannot quit their job or is assigned overseas.

  • COVID-19 limitations or challenges related to post-pandemic travel continue to persist.

In these situations, a request for exemption from attending in person must be submitted along with the appropriate documentation, and, if feasible, alternatives such as video conferencing or representation by Power of Attorney (PoA) should be proposed.

Role of Power of Attorney (PoA):

A party unable to attend can send an authorized representative, usually a family member wielding a special power of attorney in their stead. A holder of a PoA can represent them vigorously in court for specific procedural business and handle matters quite effectively with great liberty.

But this is not entirely a replacement for face-to-face contact. Courts usually require a minimum of one appearance, generally for ultimate approval, must be made by the individual concerned, even if it's through video link.

Use of Video Conferencing:

After COVID, the Indian judiciary has become increasingly accepting of technology in legal proceedings. Video conferencing is likely to be commonly used for recording statements, especially when individuals are in different regions globally.

However, video conferencing needs to be:

  •  Approved by the court in advance.

  • Complete through an authorized legal platform (such as the official family court website or NIC).

  • Backed by authentic identity verification documents

  • Supervised, ideally at the Indian Embassy or a nearby notary/lawyer’s office overseas, to guarantee authenticity.

Can the Entire Divorce Process Be Done Remotely?

Technically, not yet. Even though many aspects of the procedure can now be managed online—submitting petitions, holding virtual hearings, providing documents—courts still prefer to verify the parties' agreement either physically or virtually at least once.

Besides, a few family courts in India may still insist on personal presence due to differences in state policies or old infrastructure.

Thus, while a fully no-court divorce is not fully possible, the necessity of going long distances or flying to India can often be avoided, given that the circumstances are justified and the court concurs.

How to Approach This in Practice:

Here's what partners can consider if they want to avoid appearing in court personally:

  • Appoint a family lawyer with prior experience in online divorce processes.

  • See that all the terms of the settlement (alimony, custody of children, real estate) are properly stated and documented.

  • Submit a request for waiver of appearance along with the supporting documents for health/work/overseas residence.

  • Submit your request for video conferencing authorization in advance.

  • Have a notarized Power of Attorney prepared if necessary.

  • Coordinate with the court schedule for virtual hearings or filings.

In Conclusion, Divorce is a private issue, and as long as both parties are willing to separate peacefully, then the legal steps involved should not be an issue. Indian courts have demonstrated understanding and empathy during this shift by allowing remote video appearances and other technology-enabled conveniences.

Although existing laws mandate some degree of judicial involvement to confirm consent, a mutual divorce without complete court presence is becoming more feasible, particularly with legal assistance and court endorsement.

Ultimately, the legal system is not merely about regulations—it focuses on resolution, equity, and respect. For couples opting to separate amicably, the courts are beginning to adapt their approach more flexibly.